1820 Bath Co., KY - age 8 living with her parents and seven siblings.
1870 Brown Co., IN - Hamblen Twp., Jaily age 58 is living with her son Henry age 26. She is still listed as head of household. The real estate is valued at $800.
Box 97 Civil Criminal, No. 47 Brown Circuit Court, June Term, 1879: Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, et al. Box 97, File 3, Filed June 9th, 1879, Eliakim Hamblin, Clerk. Summons issued to Sheriff Monroe County, Quick & Roberts Plaintiff's Attorney.
Jaily G. Hunt, vs. William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt & Thomas Mulligan Affidavit of nonresident, Filed June 9, 1879, Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk.
State of Indiana, Brown County. In the Brown County Circuit Court June Term 1879. Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt & Thomas Mullikin - Affidavit of non residence
Henry C. Hunt being duly sworn upon his oath that the above named defendants William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt, are nonresidents of the State of Indiana; and that they are necessary and proper parties defendants to this action, the same being brought for title, to quiet title, and for the possession of real estate in Brown County and State of Indiana. Henry C. Hunt. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of June 1879. Eliakim Hamblen, clerk
Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt & Thomas Millikin, Civil Action, Complaint, Filed June 9, 1879 Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk, Quick and Roberts Attys for Plf.
State of Indiana, Brown County: In Brown Circuit Court June Term 1879. Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Thomas Mullikin, Suit to quiet title, &c.
1st Jaily G. Hunt plaintiff complains of William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Thomas Mullikin defendants and says that heretofore to wit: On the [blank] day of [blank] 1860 one John Hunt since deceased by Warranty Deed conveyed to one Seth F. Hunt now deceased in trust for the said plaintiff and her heirs and assigns the following real estate in Brown County, and State of Indiana, to wit: The South West quarter of the North West quarter of Section two (2) in Township nine (9) North of Range two (2) East containing forty (40) acres. Plaintiff further avers that the said Seth F.Hunt at the time of the said conveyance executed to the said plaintiff a title bond conditioned for the conveyance of the said real estate to the said plaintiff which title bond is lost or destroyed for which reason the said plaintiff is unable to file a copy herewith, Plaintiff further avers that directly after making of the deed as aforesaid to the said Seth F. Hunt and the execution of the title bond to the said plaintiff by the said Seth F. Hunt as aforesaid the said Seth F. Hunt removed to the State of Missouri and shortly after his said removal departed this life without having made and executed to the said plaintiff a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate leaving as his heirs the said William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt.Plaintiff further avers that the said Seth F. Hunt and Mary L. Hunt from the time of said conveyance so made as aforesaid up to the time of his death held the said real estate in trust for the benefit of said plaintiff her heirs and assigns and that ever since the death of said Seth F. Hunt the said defendants, William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt as the children and heirs of said Seth F. Hunt deceased have held the said real estate in trust for the said plaintiff her heirs and assisgns, and that the said William P. Hunt, Lovonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt have wholly neglected, refused and failed to execute to said plaintiff, a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate. Hunt from the time of said conveyance so made as aforesaid up to the time of his death held the said real estate in trust for the benefit of said plaintiff her heirs and assigns and that ever since the death of said Seth F. Hunt the said defendants, William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt as the children and heirs of said Seth F. Hunt deceased have held the said real estate in trust for the said plaintiff her heirs and assisgns, and that the said William P. Hunt, Lovonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt have wholly neglected, refused and failed to execute to said plaintiff, a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate. Hunt from the time of said conveyance so made as aforesaid up to the time of his death held the said real estate in trust for the benefit of said plaintiff her heirs and assigns and that ever since the death of said Seth F. Hunt the said defendants, William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt as the children and heirs of said Seth F. Hunt deceased have held the said real estate in trust for the said plaintiff her heirs and assisgns, and that the said William P. Hunt, Lovonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt have wholly neglected, refused and failed to execute to said plaintiff, a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt as the children and heirs of said Seth F. Hunt deceased have held the said real estate in trust for the said plaintiff her heirs and assisgns, and that the said William P. Hunt, Lovonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt have wholly neglected, refused and failed to execute to said plaintiff, a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt as the children and heirs of said Seth F. Hunt deceased have held the said real estate in trust for the said plaintiff her heirs and assisgns, and that the said William P. Hunt, Lovonia H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt have wholly neglected, refused and failed to execute to said plaintiff, a good and sufficient deed of conveyance to said real estate.
Plaintiff would therefore ask the Court that on the final hearing of this complaint to order adjudge and decree the title to said real estate in the said Plaintiff, and to appoint a commissioner to convey to the said Plaintiff by warranty Deed a good and sufficient title to the said real estate to said plaintiff.
And to further order adjudge and decree to the said plaintiff, all the right, title and interest of said defendants William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Mary L. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt. in and to said real estate. And the plaintiff further avers that the said deed executed by the said John Hunt to the said Seth F. Hunt for the said real estate so conveyed as aforesaid is lost or destroyed, wherefore plaintiff is unable to file a copy of said deed herewith.
2nd And for a second and further paragraph of complaint herein, the plaintiff says that the said defendant Thomas Mullikin has a pretended title to said real estate and claims possession of the same, which pretended title the said defendant holds under and by virtue of foreclosure of a Mortgage which was void, which real estate is described as follows, to wit: The South West quarter of the North West quarter of Section two (2) in Township nine (9) North of Range two (2) East, containing forty acres. Plaintiff further avers that the said defendant Thomas Mullikin pretends to hold the said real estate adversely to this plaintiff and pretends to have the possession thereof. Plaintiff would therefore ask the Court, that on the hearing of this Complaint,to determine the Title to said real estate and settle the question of Title and quiet the title in and to said real estate, in and to this plaintiff.
3rd And for a further and third paragraph of complaint herein the plaintiff says she is the owner of in fee simple and entitled to the possession of the following described real estate, situate in Brown County and State of Indiana, to-wit: The South West quarter of the North West quarter of Section two (2) in Township nine (9) North of Range two (2) East, containing forty acres; that the said defendant Thomas Mullikin now holds possession of the said land without right, and for six years last past has unlawfully kept the plaintiff out of possession, wherefore she demands judgment for the recovery of the said land, and one hundred dollars damages for being kept out of possession, and grant to plaintiff all other and further relief as may seem just and proper.
Quick and Roberts, Attys for Ptf.
Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Thos. Mullikin, et al - Summons Circuit Court Filed in the Clerk's Office To June Term 1879, Quick & Robert
Summons Circuit Court, The State of Indiana, Brown County, SS: The State of Indiana, to the Sheriff of Monroe County, Greeting: You are hereby commanded to summon Thomas Mullikin inpleaded with William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt et al. to appear in the Circuit Court of Brown County, before the Judge thereof, on the second day of the next Term, to be held at the Court House in Nashville, on the Fourth Monday of June 1879, to answer the complaint of Jaily G. Hunt to quiet title to Real Estate &c. and of this writ make due return. Witness, Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk of said Court, and the seal thereof hereunto affixed, at Nashville, this 10th day of June 1879. Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk
Served as commanded by Reading to and within the hearing of the within named Deft. Thomas Mullikin this 11th day of June 1879. W.M. Alexander, Sheriff of Monroe County, Ind. Sheriff's Fees Mileage $20, Service 35, Copy --, Return & PW(?) 15, Total 70
No. 47 Brown Ct. Ct. Oct. 7, 1879 Jaily G. Hunt vs William P. Hunt and others. Separate demurrer of deft.
In the Brown Circuit Court October Term 1879 Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavonia H. Hunt and others.
Comes now Thomas Mullikin defendant herein and demurrer to the complaint for the following --- of objection. That said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him.
Richard L. Coffey, Atty for deft.
Editor's Affidavit, State of Indiana, Brown County, ss: Personally appeared before the undersigned Alonzo Allison publisher of Jacksonian a public Weekly Newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in Nashville in the County aforesaid, who being duly sworn, upon his oath saith that the notice of which the attached is a true copy, was duly published in said paper for three weeks successively, the first of which publication was the 13th day of June 1879. Alonzo Allison. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 28 day of October 1879. Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk. Received [blank], of [blank] Dollars and [blank] Cents in full for publishing the above notice [blank]
[clipping attached] Notice to Non-Residents, State of Indiana, Brown County, In the Brown County Circuit Court, June Term 1879.
Jaily G. Hunt vs. William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hunt, Joseph A. Hunt, Priscilla F. Hunt, Thomas Mullikin To Quiet Title, &c.
Now comes the plaintiff, by Quick & Roberts, her attorneys, and files her complaint herein together with an affidavit that said defendants, William P. Hunt, Lavona H. Hunt, Lorona E. Hunt, Loretta J. Hun, Joseph A. Hunt and Priscilla F. Hunt are necessary parties to this action, and that they are not residents of the State of Indiana.
Notice is therefore hereby given said defendants, that unless they be and appear on the first day of the next term of the Brown Circuit Court, to be holden on the Fourth Monday of June, A.D. 1879, a the Court-house in Nashville in said County and State, and answer or demur to said complaint, the same will be heard and determined in their absence.
Witness my name and seal of said Court affixed, at Nashville this 10th day of June A.D. 1879. Eliakim Hamblen, Clerk {Seal}
Filed Oct. 28, 1879, Eliakim Hamblen Clerk
State of Indiana on relation of William M. Waltman Prosecuting Attorney for 9 Judicial Circuit vs. Jaley Hunt, Rhuben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazal Hunt, Maranda Hunt Filed Mar. 20, 1895 C.P. Hanna, Clerk, Brown C.C., William M. Waltman Prossecuting Attorney by Riley Gordon, Deputy.
State of Indiana, Brown County, ss: Circuit Court, April term, 1895. State of Indiana on relation of William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit: Complaint to Enforce Tax Lien vs. Jaley Hunt, Reuben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazel Hunt & Maranda Hunt. The State of Indiana on the relation of William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit as plaintiff complains of the defendant Jaley Hunt, Reuben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazel Hunt & Maranda Hunt and says that defendant, Jaley Hunt, Reuben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazel Hunt & Bazel Hunt, as appears from the tax duplicate of said Brown County for the years 1890, 1891, 1892 and 1893 was assessed and taxed with the following described real estate situated in said county, towit: S1/2, SE1/4, Section 26 Town 9 Range 2 80 acres also NE1/4,NE1/4 Section 35 Town 9 Range 2 40 acres.
For the year 1890 $144.90/100, for the year 1891, $152.62/100, for the year 1892 $155.26/100, for the year 1893 $155.26/100, making the aggregate sum and amount of $155.26/100, taxes, penalty, interest and cost due and unpaid on said real estate.
Said real estate was duly and lawfully returned delinquent, advertised and offered for sale by the treasurer of said Brown County at the Court-house door in the town of Nashville, said county, on the second Monday of February 1891, and on the second Monday of February, 1892, and on the second Monday of February 1893, and on the second Monday of February 1894, for each of said years for said taxes, penalty, interest and cost. That said real estate was returned by said treasurer of said county for each of said above last named years no sold for want of bidders.
Wherefore the plantiff demands judgment without relief from valuation and appraisement laws, and without any stay of execution for the sum and amount of $155.26/100, and that said real estate be sold by the sheriff of said county as other real estate is sold on execution, cost of this suite and all other proper relief. William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney. By Riley Gordon Depty.
State Ex. Rel. vs Jaley Hunt Summons, Circuit Court, To 1st day Apr. Term. Sheriff's Fees Mileage $60, Service 35, Copy --, Return 10 [Total] $105.
Summons. State of Indiana, Brown County, SS: The State of Indiana, to the Sheriff of Said County - Greetings: You are hereby commanded to summon Jaley Hunt to appear before the Circuit Court of Brown County, before the Judge thereof, on the first day of the next term, to be held in the Court House, in Nashville, on the Third Monday of April 1895, to answer the complaint of the State of Indiana Ex the Relation of Wm. M. Waltman, Pross. Atty. To Enforce Tax Lien and of this writ make due return. Witness, I, Com P. Hanna, Clerk of said Court, the seal thereof hereto affixed, at Nashville, this 20th day of March 1895. Com P. Hanna Clerk. I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of the original Summons. [blank] Sheriff.
Comes to hand March the 20, 1895 Served as commanded by Reading to and in the hearing of the with in named Defendant March the 21 1895, George J. King.
No. 815 Brown Circuit Court April Term 1895, State Ex Rel. vs. Jaley Hunt, Reuben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazel Hunt, Maranda Hunt, Box 169, File 38, Filed Mar. 20, 1895, C.P. Hannah Clerk Brown C.C.
State of Indiana on Relation of Wm. M. Waltman Prosecuting Attrny for 9th Judicial Circuit vs. Jaley Hunt Heirs, Reuben Hunt, Maranda Hunt, John Hunt, Lidia Dow, Henry C. Hunt, Bazil Hunt, Sarah E. Sizen, Mary A. Kersey, Nancy A. Dull[Dove]
State of Indiana, Brown County, ss: Circuit Court April term, 1895. State of Indiana on relation of William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit vs. Jaley Hunt heirs: Reuben Hunt, Maranda Hunt, John Hunt, Bazel Hunt, Henry C. Hunt, Lidia Dow, Sarah E. Sizen, Mary A. Kersy & Nancy J. Dull [Dove]: Complaint to enforce tax lien.
The State of Indiana on the relation of William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney for the Ninth Judicial Circuit, as plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that said defendant, as appears from the tax duplicate of said Brown County for the years, 1891, 1892, 1893, and 1894 was assessed and taxed with the following described real estate situated in said county, towit: S1/2, SE1/4, Section 26 Town 9 Range 2 80 acres also NE1/4, NE1/4, Section 35 Town 9 Range 2 40 acres.
for the year 1890 $144.90/100. For the year 1891 $152 62/100 for the year 1892 $155.26/100 for the year 1893 $155 26/100 making the aggregate amount of $155 26/100 including penalty, interest, and cost, making the aggregate sum and amount of $155 26//100. taxes, penalty, interest, and cost due and unpaid on said real estate.
Said real estate was duly and lawfully returned delinquent, advertised, and offered for sale by the treasurer of said Brown County at the Court house door in the town of Nashville, said county, on the second Monday of February 1892, and on the second Monday of February 1893, and on the second Monday of February 1894, and on the second Monday of February
1895, for each of said years for said taxes, penalty, interest, and cost. That said real estate was returned by said treasurer of said country for each of said above last named years not sold for want of bidders.
The defendant, is made party defendants to this action to answer as to any mortgages, liens, claims, rights, interests, judgements, or titles he may have or claim in and to said real estate.
Wherefore the plaintiff demands judgement without relief from Valuation and Appraisement Laws, and without any stay of execution for the sum and amount of . . . . and that said real estate be sold by the sheriff of said county as other real estate is sold on execution, cost if this suit and all other proper relief. William M. Waltman, Prosecuting Attorney, Riley Gordon Depty.
The State of Ind. Ex. Rel Wm. H. Shea, Pros. Atty. vs. Jaley Hunt (heirs) Summons Circuit Court. To 1st day Feb. Term. Wm. H. Shea. Sheriff's Fees Mileage $[blank] Service 25, Copy [blank], Return 10, Total 35.
Summons. State of Indiana, Brown County, SS: The State of Indiana, to the Sheriff of Said County - Greeting: You are hereby commanded to summon Ruben Hunt, John Hunt, Bazzle Hunt and Miranda Hunt to appear before the Circuit Court of Brown County, before the Judge thereof, on the first day of the next term, to be held in the Court House, in Nashville, on the first Monday of Februrary 1896 to answer the complaint of The State Indiana Ex. Rel. Wm. H. Shea Pross. Atty. to Enforce lien for Taxes. and of this write make due return. Witness, I, Com P. Hanna, Clerk of said Court, the seal thereof hereto affixed, at Nashville, this 30th day of December 1895. Com P. Hanna Clerk. I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of the original summons [blank] Sheriff.
Came to hand January the 1, 1896 Served as commanded by Serving to ---- --- Ruben Hunt by Copy ---- ---- and Resit--- of the State January the 3, 1896 George J. King.
State Ex Rel. vs. Rhuben Hunt Et. al. Filed Sep. 7 1896 C. P. Hanna, Clerk Brown CC
S e of Indiana, Brown County: SS. Personally appeared before the undersigned ALonzo Allison Publisher of the Democrat a public weekly newspaper & general circulation printed and published in the town of Nashville in the county of Brown and State of Indiana was being duly sworn upon his oath saith that the Notice of which the annexed is a true copy was duly published in said paper for tent weeks successively the first of which publication was on the 3d day of Aug. 1896 and the last of which publication was on the 4th day of September AD 1896. Alonzo Allison.
Subscribed and sworn to before me Sept. 7th 1896 Com P. Hanna, Clerk.
[Clipping] Notice to Non-Residents. The State of Indiana, Brown County, In the Brown Circuit Court, September Term, 1896.
The State of Indiana, Ex. Rel. William H. Shea, Pros. Attorney vs. Ruben Hunt, Maranda Hunt, John Hunt, Henry C. Hunt, et al, heirs of Jaley Hunt, deceased. Complaint No.
Now comes the Plaintiff, by William H. Shea, Prosecuting Attorney, and files its complaint herein, together with an affidavit that said defendants John A. Hunt, Henry C. Hunt, Bazel W. Hunt, Lydia Dow, Sarah E. Sizen, Mary A. Kersy and Nancy J. Dull [Dove], are not residents of the State of Indiana; that said action is to foreclose lien on real estate for taxes, and that said non-resident defendants are necessary parties thereto.
Notice is therefore hereby given said Defendants, last named, that unless they be and appear on the first day of the next term of the Brown Circuit Court, to be holden on the First Monday of September A.D. 1896 at the Court House in Nashville, in said County and State and answer or demur to said complaint, the same will be heard and determined in their absence.
Witness my name and the Seal of said Court, affixed at Nashville this 1st day of July A.D. 1896. Com. P. Hanna, Clerk. July 3, 1896.
The State of Indiana, Brown County, SS: Complaint to Enforce Tax lien. State of Indiana on Relation of William H. Shea Prossecuting Attorney for the 9th Judicial circuit vs. Jaily Hunt Hiers, John A. Hu, Henry C. Hunt, Bazil W. Hunt, Lidia Dow, Sara E. Sizen, Mary A. Kersy, Nancy J. Dull [Dove]. Comes now Riley Gordon who being duly sworn upon his oath says that the Residence of the within named Defendants is unknown and by diligent enquire cannot be assertained. Riley Gordon. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 25th day of June 1896. Com. P. Hanna, Clerk.
Polly Ann
Maranda R.
John A[bsalom]
Reuben H[ezekiah]
Lydia E.
Sarah E.
Foster M.
Henry E.
Benjamin W.
Nancy Jane
No comments:
Post a Comment